14

Pros and Cons of Marriage to a Chinese Woman

18 Jan 2017 21:24 | Author: User1492050032 | Category: Banking corporate dissertation governance sector

Are you new to Marriage Builders ®? If you are new to the Marriage Builders ® web site, we strongly recommend that you begin your experience by taking our short tour.

Comments
  1. author
    bigmeercat591 18 Jan 2017 04:28

    In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s landmark Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) decision, same-sex marriage is now protected federally in all 50 states. In addition to Obergefell clearing the way for same-sex couples throughout the United States to get married, unions that couldn''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''t be finalized until this very ruling may now proceed. The ruling ushered in many other changes as well, including the recognition of marriages performed in other states and a more simplified divorce process.

    While Obergefell dramatically altered the legal landscape for same-sex couples, citing the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment , there still are somelegal considerationsyou may want to make beforetaking the plunge.

    As a result of the Supreme Court''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s historic Obergefell decision on June 26, 2015, same-sex marriage is now a reality all across the United States. Same-sex couples can get married--and have their marriages recognized--anywhere in the U.S..

    In June of 2013, prior to Obergefell, the Supreme Court issued another major marriage equality ruling in U.S. v. Windsor, which held that same-sex couples must be considered legally married for federal purposes and qualify for the same federal benefits opposite sex couples receive, including immigration status, Social Security benefits, and laws exempting married couples from inheritance taxes and gift taxes. To learn more about the Windsor case, see Same Sex Married Couples Will Soon Receive Federal Benefits.

    Compliments of Correct, not Politically Correct , authored by Frank Turek. For more information, visit

    60 David Kupelian, The Marketing of Evil , (Nashville, WND Books, 2005), pg. 37.

    61 J. Budziszewski, What We Can’t Not Know, (Dallas: Spence, 2003), pg. 190.

    62 George Gilder, Men and Marriage, (Adler, 1986), pg. 74.

    The first court challenge to same-sex marriage bans came in 1970, after two gay University of Minnesota students were denied their request for a marriage license on the grounds that they were of the same gender. They claimed violations of the First, Eighth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Their claim was dismissed and subsequently appealed to the Minnesota Supreme Court, which also rejected their claim.

    Finally, in 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a summary dismissal of the case ( Baker v. Nelson ), thereby affirming the Minnesota Supreme Court''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s ruling. This ruling set a precedent that would not be reversed federally for another 43 years.

    June 17 , 2008 - As gay and lesbians celebrated marriage in California, Norway''''''''''''''''s upper house voted in favour of gay marriage today. The 23-17 vote comes after the country''''''''''''''''s lower house voted 84-41 for gender neutral legislation in parliament last week. The new legislation becomes effective January 1, 2009. Norway becomes the first Scandinavian country to have equal marriage. Will Sweden soon follow Norway''''''''''''''''s example?

    May 18, 2008 - We were enjoying the goods and goals of marriage in Canada, taking a break as gay marriage advocates, when we received news on May 15th that the California Supreme Court released a long-awaited decision in favour of same-sex marriage. We immediately thought of our friends and supporters in California and across the United States who have been fighting for years to see their dreams come true.

    Denying some people the option to marry is discriminatory and creates a second class of citizens. On July 25, 2014 Miami-Dade County Circuit Court… Read More

    Same-sex couples should have access to the same benefits enjoyed by heterosexual married couples. There are 1,138 benefits, rights and protections. Read More

    All content on this website, including dictionary, thesaurus, literature, geography, and other reference data is for informational purposes only. This information should not be considered complete, up to date, and is not intended to be used in place of a visit, consultation, or advice of a legal, medical, or any other professional.

    Same-sex marriage has highlighted high-profile relationships between theology, church, state, and society. In June 2015 the Supreme Court issued its Obergefell v. Hodges decision, which ruled that states must allow same-sex couples to marry. A Pew Forum poll before the decision found that most Americans (57%) thought same-sex marriage should be legal, but less than a third of evangelicals agreed. Many are now asking questions about the difference between civil and religious marriage, the place of religious dissent on same-sex marriage, and pastoral care.

    Sign up today for our newsletter: Christianity Today Weekly. CTWeekly delivers the best content from ChristianityToday.com to your inbox each week.

  2. author
    blueswan244 18 Jan 2017 09:23

    I think it s all pro. As long as the child is raised in a household where it knows that it is loved and cared for, then the worst that could happen is that the child will learn to embrace diversity! Having two parents that love and support you is the best thing that can happen to a child, regardless of whether they are the same or different sexes. The world is drastically different than it was in the era of "Leave it to Beaver," and while that may still be the ideal for some it s absolutely not the only way to do things.

  3. author
    User1488491852 18 Jan 2017 00:19

    In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s landmark Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) decision, same-sex marriage is now protected federally in all 50 states. In addition to Obergefell clearing the way for same-sex couples throughout the United States to get married, unions that couldn''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''t be finalized until this very ruling may now proceed. The ruling ushered in many other changes as well, including the recognition of marriages performed in other states and a more simplified divorce process.

    While Obergefell dramatically altered the legal landscape for same-sex couples, citing the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment , there still are somelegal considerationsyou may want to make beforetaking the plunge.

    As a result of the Supreme Court''''''''''''''''s historic Obergefell decision on June 26, 2015, same-sex marriage is now a reality all across the United States. Same-sex couples can get married--and have their marriages recognized--anywhere in the U.S..

    In June of 2013, prior to Obergefell, the Supreme Court issued another major marriage equality ruling in U.S. v. Windsor, which held that same-sex couples must be considered legally married for federal purposes and qualify for the same federal benefits opposite sex couples receive, including immigration status, Social Security benefits, and laws exempting married couples from inheritance taxes and gift taxes. To learn more about the Windsor case, see Same Sex Married Couples Will Soon Receive Federal Benefits.

    Compliments of Correct, not Politically Correct , authored by Frank Turek. For more information, visit

    60 David Kupelian, The Marketing of Evil , (Nashville, WND Books, 2005), pg. 37.

    61 J. Budziszewski, What We Can’t Not Know, (Dallas: Spence, 2003), pg. 190.

    62 George Gilder, Men and Marriage, (Adler, 1986), pg. 74.

    The first court challenge to same-sex marriage bans came in 1970, after two gay University of Minnesota students were denied their request for a marriage license on the grounds that they were of the same gender. They claimed violations of the First, Eighth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Their claim was dismissed and subsequently appealed to the Minnesota Supreme Court, which also rejected their claim.

    Finally, in 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a summary dismissal of the case ( Baker v. Nelson ), thereby affirming the Minnesota Supreme Court''''s ruling. This ruling set a precedent that would not be reversed federally for another 43 years.

    June 17 , 2008 - As gay and lesbians celebrated marriage in California, Norway''s upper house voted in favour of gay marriage today. The 23-17 vote comes after the country''s lower house voted 84-41 for gender neutral legislation in parliament last week. The new legislation becomes effective January 1, 2009. Norway becomes the first Scandinavian country to have equal marriage. Will Sweden soon follow Norway''s example?

    May 18, 2008 - We were enjoying the goods and goals of marriage in Canada, taking a break as gay marriage advocates, when we received news on May 15th that the California Supreme Court released a long-awaited decision in favour of same-sex marriage. We immediately thought of our friends and supporters in California and across the United States who have been fighting for years to see their dreams come true.

    Denying some people the option to marry is discriminatory and creates a second class of citizens. On July 25, 2014 Miami-Dade County Circuit Court… Read More

    Same-sex couples should have access to the same benefits enjoyed by heterosexual married couples. There are 1,138 benefits, rights and protections. Read More

  4. author
    silverpanda337 18 Jan 2017 06:18

    In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court''''''''''''''''s landmark Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) decision, same-sex marriage is now protected federally in all 50 states. In addition to Obergefell clearing the way for same-sex couples throughout the United States to get married, unions that couldn''''''''''''''''t be finalized until this very ruling may now proceed. The ruling ushered in many other changes as well, including the recognition of marriages performed in other states and a more simplified divorce process.

    While Obergefell dramatically altered the legal landscape for same-sex couples, citing the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment , there still are somelegal considerationsyou may want to make beforetaking the plunge.

    As a result of the Supreme Court''''''''s historic Obergefell decision on June 26, 2015, same-sex marriage is now a reality all across the United States. Same-sex couples can get married--and have their marriages recognized--anywhere in the U.S..

    In June of 2013, prior to Obergefell, the Supreme Court issued another major marriage equality ruling in U.S. v. Windsor, which held that same-sex couples must be considered legally married for federal purposes and qualify for the same federal benefits opposite sex couples receive, including immigration status, Social Security benefits, and laws exempting married couples from inheritance taxes and gift taxes. To learn more about the Windsor case, see Same Sex Married Couples Will Soon Receive Federal Benefits.

    Compliments of Correct, not Politically Correct , authored by Frank Turek. For more information, visit

    60 David Kupelian, The Marketing of Evil , (Nashville, WND Books, 2005), pg. 37.

    61 J. Budziszewski, What We Can’t Not Know, (Dallas: Spence, 2003), pg. 190.

    62 George Gilder, Men and Marriage, (Adler, 1986), pg. 74.

    The first court challenge to same-sex marriage bans came in 1970, after two gay University of Minnesota students were denied their request for a marriage license on the grounds that they were of the same gender. They claimed violations of the First, Eighth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Their claim was dismissed and subsequently appealed to the Minnesota Supreme Court, which also rejected their claim.

    Finally, in 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a summary dismissal of the case ( Baker v. Nelson ), thereby affirming the Minnesota Supreme Court''s ruling. This ruling set a precedent that would not be reversed federally for another 43 years.

    June 17 , 2008 - As gay and lesbians celebrated marriage in California, Norway's upper house voted in favour of gay marriage today. The 23-17 vote comes after the country's lower house voted 84-41 for gender neutral legislation in parliament last week. The new legislation becomes effective January 1, 2009. Norway becomes the first Scandinavian country to have equal marriage. Will Sweden soon follow Norway's example?

    May 18, 2008 - We were enjoying the goods and goals of marriage in Canada, taking a break as gay marriage advocates, when we received news on May 15th that the California Supreme Court released a long-awaited decision in favour of same-sex marriage. We immediately thought of our friends and supporters in California and across the United States who have been fighting for years to see their dreams come true.

  5. author
    yellowgoose656 18 Jan 2017 03:51

    In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court''''s landmark Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) decision, same-sex marriage is now protected federally in all 50 states. In addition to Obergefell clearing the way for same-sex couples throughout the United States to get married, unions that couldn''''t be finalized until this very ruling may now proceed. The ruling ushered in many other changes as well, including the recognition of marriages performed in other states and a more simplified divorce process.

    While Obergefell dramatically altered the legal landscape for same-sex couples, citing the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment , there still are somelegal considerationsyou may want to make beforetaking the plunge.

    As a result of the Supreme Court''s historic Obergefell decision on June 26, 2015, same-sex marriage is now a reality all across the United States. Same-sex couples can get married--and have their marriages recognized--anywhere in the U.S..

    In June of 2013, prior to Obergefell, the Supreme Court issued another major marriage equality ruling in U.S. v. Windsor, which held that same-sex couples must be considered legally married for federal purposes and qualify for the same federal benefits opposite sex couples receive, including immigration status, Social Security benefits, and laws exempting married couples from inheritance taxes and gift taxes. To learn more about the Windsor case, see Same Sex Married Couples Will Soon Receive Federal Benefits.

    Compliments of Correct, not Politically Correct , authored by Frank Turek. For more information, visit

    60 David Kupelian, The Marketing of Evil , (Nashville, WND Books, 2005), pg. 37.

    61 J. Budziszewski, What We Can’t Not Know, (Dallas: Spence, 2003), pg. 190.

    62 George Gilder, Men and Marriage, (Adler, 1986), pg. 74.

  6. author
    User1490925166 18 Jan 2017 05:24

    They normally have different strengths as far as physical. Don t say well that shouldn t be used. Yes it SHOULD. Because a group of women playing a group of women is FAIR. Why should they all be co-ed as oppose to having seperate leagues as they currently do? I notice no arguement in defense of what you are asking for.

  7. author
    User1490092375 18 Jan 2017 02:08

    In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s landmark Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) decision, same-sex marriage is now protected federally in all 50 states. In addition to Obergefell clearing the way for same-sex couples throughout the United States to get married, unions that couldn''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''t be finalized until this very ruling may now proceed. The ruling ushered in many other changes as well, including the recognition of marriages performed in other states and a more simplified divorce process.

    While Obergefell dramatically altered the legal landscape for same-sex couples, citing the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment , there still are somelegal considerationsyou may want to make beforetaking the plunge.

    As a result of the Supreme Court''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s historic Obergefell decision on June 26, 2015, same-sex marriage is now a reality all across the United States. Same-sex couples can get married--and have their marriages recognized--anywhere in the U.S..

    In June of 2013, prior to Obergefell, the Supreme Court issued another major marriage equality ruling in U.S. v. Windsor, which held that same-sex couples must be considered legally married for federal purposes and qualify for the same federal benefits opposite sex couples receive, including immigration status, Social Security benefits, and laws exempting married couples from inheritance taxes and gift taxes. To learn more about the Windsor case, see Same Sex Married Couples Will Soon Receive Federal Benefits.

    Compliments of Correct, not Politically Correct , authored by Frank Turek. For more information, visit

    60 David Kupelian, The Marketing of Evil , (Nashville, WND Books, 2005), pg. 37.

    61 J. Budziszewski, What We Can’t Not Know, (Dallas: Spence, 2003), pg. 190.

    62 George Gilder, Men and Marriage, (Adler, 1986), pg. 74.

    The first court challenge to same-sex marriage bans came in 1970, after two gay University of Minnesota students were denied their request for a marriage license on the grounds that they were of the same gender. They claimed violations of the First, Eighth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Their claim was dismissed and subsequently appealed to the Minnesota Supreme Court, which also rejected their claim.

    Finally, in 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a summary dismissal of the case ( Baker v. Nelson ), thereby affirming the Minnesota Supreme Court''''''''s ruling. This ruling set a precedent that would not be reversed federally for another 43 years.

    June 17 , 2008 - As gay and lesbians celebrated marriage in California, Norway''''s upper house voted in favour of gay marriage today. The 23-17 vote comes after the country''''s lower house voted 84-41 for gender neutral legislation in parliament last week. The new legislation becomes effective January 1, 2009. Norway becomes the first Scandinavian country to have equal marriage. Will Sweden soon follow Norway''''s example?

    May 18, 2008 - We were enjoying the goods and goals of marriage in Canada, taking a break as gay marriage advocates, when we received news on May 15th that the California Supreme Court released a long-awaited decision in favour of same-sex marriage. We immediately thought of our friends and supporters in California and across the United States who have been fighting for years to see their dreams come true.

    Denying some people the option to marry is discriminatory and creates a second class of citizens. On July 25, 2014 Miami-Dade County Circuit Court… Read More

    Same-sex couples should have access to the same benefits enjoyed by heterosexual married couples. There are 1,138 benefits, rights and protections. Read More

    All content on this website, including dictionary, thesaurus, literature, geography, and other reference data is for informational purposes only. This information should not be considered complete, up to date, and is not intended to be used in place of a visit, consultation, or advice of a legal, medical, or any other professional.

  8. author
    redmeercat671 18 Jan 2017 08:28

    In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court''''''''s landmark Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) decision, same-sex marriage is now protected federally in all 50 states. In addition to Obergefell clearing the way for same-sex couples throughout the United States to get married, unions that couldn''''''''t be finalized until this very ruling may now proceed. The ruling ushered in many other changes as well, including the recognition of marriages performed in other states and a more simplified divorce process.

    While Obergefell dramatically altered the legal landscape for same-sex couples, citing the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment , there still are somelegal considerationsyou may want to make beforetaking the plunge.

    As a result of the Supreme Court''''s historic Obergefell decision on June 26, 2015, same-sex marriage is now a reality all across the United States. Same-sex couples can get married--and have their marriages recognized--anywhere in the U.S..

    In June of 2013, prior to Obergefell, the Supreme Court issued another major marriage equality ruling in U.S. v. Windsor, which held that same-sex couples must be considered legally married for federal purposes and qualify for the same federal benefits opposite sex couples receive, including immigration status, Social Security benefits, and laws exempting married couples from inheritance taxes and gift taxes. To learn more about the Windsor case, see Same Sex Married Couples Will Soon Receive Federal Benefits.

    Compliments of Correct, not Politically Correct , authored by Frank Turek. For more information, visit

    60 David Kupelian, The Marketing of Evil , (Nashville, WND Books, 2005), pg. 37.

    61 J. Budziszewski, What We Can’t Not Know, (Dallas: Spence, 2003), pg. 190.

    62 George Gilder, Men and Marriage, (Adler, 1986), pg. 74.

    The first court challenge to same-sex marriage bans came in 1970, after two gay University of Minnesota students were denied their request for a marriage license on the grounds that they were of the same gender. They claimed violations of the First, Eighth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Their claim was dismissed and subsequently appealed to the Minnesota Supreme Court, which also rejected their claim.

    Finally, in 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a summary dismissal of the case ( Baker v. Nelson ), thereby affirming the Minnesota Supreme Court's ruling. This ruling set a precedent that would not be reversed federally for another 43 years.

  9. author
    User1490461809 18 Jan 2017 07:23

    In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s landmark Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) decision, same-sex marriage is now protected federally in all 50 states. In addition to Obergefell clearing the way for same-sex couples throughout the United States to get married, unions that couldn''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''t be finalized until this very ruling may now proceed. The ruling ushered in many other changes as well, including the recognition of marriages performed in other states and a more simplified divorce process.

    While Obergefell dramatically altered the legal landscape for same-sex couples, citing the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment , there still are somelegal considerationsyou may want to make beforetaking the plunge.

    As a result of the Supreme Court''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s historic Obergefell decision on June 26, 2015, same-sex marriage is now a reality all across the United States. Same-sex couples can get married--and have their marriages recognized--anywhere in the U.S..

    In June of 2013, prior to Obergefell, the Supreme Court issued another major marriage equality ruling in U.S. v. Windsor, which held that same-sex couples must be considered legally married for federal purposes and qualify for the same federal benefits opposite sex couples receive, including immigration status, Social Security benefits, and laws exempting married couples from inheritance taxes and gift taxes. To learn more about the Windsor case, see Same Sex Married Couples Will Soon Receive Federal Benefits.

    Compliments of Correct, not Politically Correct , authored by Frank Turek. For more information, visit

    60 David Kupelian, The Marketing of Evil , (Nashville, WND Books, 2005), pg. 37.

    61 J. Budziszewski, What We Can’t Not Know, (Dallas: Spence, 2003), pg. 190.

    62 George Gilder, Men and Marriage, (Adler, 1986), pg. 74.

    The first court challenge to same-sex marriage bans came in 1970, after two gay University of Minnesota students were denied their request for a marriage license on the grounds that they were of the same gender. They claimed violations of the First, Eighth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Their claim was dismissed and subsequently appealed to the Minnesota Supreme Court, which also rejected their claim.

    Finally, in 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a summary dismissal of the case ( Baker v. Nelson ), thereby affirming the Minnesota Supreme Court''''''''''''''''s ruling. This ruling set a precedent that would not be reversed federally for another 43 years.

    June 17 , 2008 - As gay and lesbians celebrated marriage in California, Norway''''''''s upper house voted in favour of gay marriage today. The 23-17 vote comes after the country''''''''s lower house voted 84-41 for gender neutral legislation in parliament last week. The new legislation becomes effective January 1, 2009. Norway becomes the first Scandinavian country to have equal marriage. Will Sweden soon follow Norway''''''''s example?

    May 18, 2008 - We were enjoying the goods and goals of marriage in Canada, taking a break as gay marriage advocates, when we received news on May 15th that the California Supreme Court released a long-awaited decision in favour of same-sex marriage. We immediately thought of our friends and supporters in California and across the United States who have been fighting for years to see their dreams come true.

    Denying some people the option to marry is discriminatory and creates a second class of citizens. On July 25, 2014 Miami-Dade County Circuit Court… Read More

    Same-sex couples should have access to the same benefits enjoyed by heterosexual married couples. There are 1,138 benefits, rights and protections. Read More

    All content on this website, including dictionary, thesaurus, literature, geography, and other reference data is for informational purposes only. This information should not be considered complete, up to date, and is not intended to be used in place of a visit, consultation, or advice of a legal, medical, or any other professional.

    Same-sex marriage has highlighted high-profile relationships between theology, church, state, and society. In June 2015 the Supreme Court issued its Obergefell v. Hodges decision, which ruled that states must allow same-sex couples to marry. A Pew Forum poll before the decision found that most Americans (57%) thought same-sex marriage should be legal, but less than a third of evangelicals agreed. Many are now asking questions about the difference between civil and religious marriage, the place of religious dissent on same-sex marriage, and pastoral care.

    Sign up today for our newsletter: Christianity Today Weekly. CTWeekly delivers the best content from ChristianityToday.com to your inbox each week.

  10. author
    orangebear156 18 Jan 2017 03:43

    In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s landmark Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) decision, same-sex marriage is now protected federally in all 50 states. In addition to Obergefell clearing the way for same-sex couples throughout the United States to get married, unions that couldn''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''t be finalized until this very ruling may now proceed. The ruling ushered in many other changes as well, including the recognition of marriages performed in other states and a more simplified divorce process.

    While Obergefell dramatically altered the legal landscape for same-sex couples, citing the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment , there still are somelegal considerationsyou may want to make beforetaking the plunge.

    As a result of the Supreme Court''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s historic Obergefell decision on June 26, 2015, same-sex marriage is now a reality all across the United States. Same-sex couples can get married--and have their marriages recognized--anywhere in the U.S..

    In June of 2013, prior to Obergefell, the Supreme Court issued another major marriage equality ruling in U.S. v. Windsor, which held that same-sex couples must be considered legally married for federal purposes and qualify for the same federal benefits opposite sex couples receive, including immigration status, Social Security benefits, and laws exempting married couples from inheritance taxes and gift taxes. To learn more about the Windsor case, see Same Sex Married Couples Will Soon Receive Federal Benefits.

    Compliments of Correct, not Politically Correct , authored by Frank Turek. For more information, visit

    60 David Kupelian, The Marketing of Evil , (Nashville, WND Books, 2005), pg. 37.

    61 J. Budziszewski, What We Can’t Not Know, (Dallas: Spence, 2003), pg. 190.

    62 George Gilder, Men and Marriage, (Adler, 1986), pg. 74.

    The first court challenge to same-sex marriage bans came in 1970, after two gay University of Minnesota students were denied their request for a marriage license on the grounds that they were of the same gender. They claimed violations of the First, Eighth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Their claim was dismissed and subsequently appealed to the Minnesota Supreme Court, which also rejected their claim.

    Finally, in 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a summary dismissal of the case ( Baker v. Nelson ), thereby affirming the Minnesota Supreme Court''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s ruling. This ruling set a precedent that would not be reversed federally for another 43 years.

    June 17 , 2008 - As gay and lesbians celebrated marriage in California, Norway''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s upper house voted in favour of gay marriage today. The 23-17 vote comes after the country''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s lower house voted 84-41 for gender neutral legislation in parliament last week. The new legislation becomes effective January 1, 2009. Norway becomes the first Scandinavian country to have equal marriage. Will Sweden soon follow Norway''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s example?

    May 18, 2008 - We were enjoying the goods and goals of marriage in Canada, taking a break as gay marriage advocates, when we received news on May 15th that the California Supreme Court released a long-awaited decision in favour of same-sex marriage. We immediately thought of our friends and supporters in California and across the United States who have been fighting for years to see their dreams come true.

    Denying some people the option to marry is discriminatory and creates a second class of citizens. On July 25, 2014 Miami-Dade County Circuit Court… Read More

    Same-sex couples should have access to the same benefits enjoyed by heterosexual married couples. There are 1,138 benefits, rights and protections. Read More

    All content on this website, including dictionary, thesaurus, literature, geography, and other reference data is for informational purposes only. This information should not be considered complete, up to date, and is not intended to be used in place of a visit, consultation, or advice of a legal, medical, or any other professional.

    Same-sex marriage has highlighted high-profile relationships between theology, church, state, and society. In June 2015 the Supreme Court issued its Obergefell v. Hodges decision, which ruled that states must allow same-sex couples to marry. A Pew Forum poll before the decision found that most Americans (57%) thought same-sex marriage should be legal, but less than a third of evangelicals agreed. Many are now asking questions about the difference between civil and religious marriage, the place of religious dissent on same-sex marriage, and pastoral care.

    Sign up today for our newsletter: Christianity Today Weekly. CTWeekly delivers the best content from ChristianityToday.com to your inbox each week.

    In response to your Guide’s chapter on “ Advantages to Having a Chinese Wife ,” I wanted to offer my personal experience with the pros and cons of being married to a Chinese woman, especially in China. I’ll just write them out in list form for you.

    As for mom, she was an oldish Red Guard during the CR, but was involved with the very conservative factions. Mom’s personality is a bit more distant than dad’s though and she nags everyone a lot. She’s a good, upright lady though.

  11. author
    organicleopard378 17 Jan 2017 22:06

    Should gay marriage be. found that in the first five years after Massachusetts legalized gay marriage in 2004, same-sex wedding. Pros and cons in debate over.

  12. author
    silverpeacock236 17 Jan 2017 22:21

    Order paper here pros and cons on same sex marriage

    Are you new to Marriage Builders ®? If you are new to the Marriage Builders ® web site, we strongly recommend that you begin your experience by taking our short tour.

  13. author
    ЧенДерелла ✨ 18 Jan 2017 00:02

    At times its easier to be a single parent because its just you and your kids and you have a stronger relationship with your kids. Also you don t have to worry if your spouse is hitting your kids or worse. The only good thing about being with the kids father is 2 incomes, but what good is that if he abuses the kids?