11

Is global climate change man-made essay » Daily Mom

18 Jan 2017 21:24 | Author: redostrich124 | Category: Vorwort zur dissertation

Vital Signs of the Planet: Global Climate Change and Global Warming. How do we know it’s happening? Here’s the evidence.

Comments
  1. author
    bluefrog137 18 Jan 2017 06:16

    Global warming and climate change refer to an increase in average global temperatures. Natural events and human activities are believed to be contributing to an increase in average global temperatures. This is caused primarily by increases in greenhouse gases such as Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ).

    As explained by the US agency, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), there are 7 indicators that would be expected to increase in a warming world (and they are), and 3 indicators would be expected to decrease (and they are):

    Scientific skepticism is healthy. Scientists should always challenge themselves to improve their understanding. Yet this isn''''''''''''''''t what happens with climate change denial. Skeptics vigorously criticise any evidence that supports man-made global warming and yet embrace any argument, op-ed, blog or study that purports to refute global warming. This website gets skeptical about global warming skepticism. Do their arguments have any scientific basis? What does the peer reviewed scientific literature say?

    Stories of the Week. SkS Highlights. El Niño/La Niña Update. Toon of the Week. Quote of the Week. Graphic of the Week. SkS in the News. Photo of the Week. SkS Spotlights. Video of the Week. Coming Soon on SkS. Poster of the Week. Climate Feedback Reviews. SkS Week in Review. 97 Hours of Consensus.

    Meanwhile, national weather agencies had begun to compile masses of reliable observations of temperature, rainfall, and the like. When the figures were analyzed they showed many rises and dips, but no steady long-term change. By the end of the 19th century, scientific opinion had turned decisively against any belief in a human influence on climate. And whatever the regional effects, few imagined that humans could affect the climate of the planet as a whole. [4]

    Prior to the 18th century, scientists had not suspected that prehistoric climates were different from the modern period. By the late 18th century, geologists found evidence of a succession of geological ages with changes in climate. There were various competing theories about these changes, and James Hutton , whose ideas of cyclic change over huge periods of time were later dubbed uniformitarianism , was among those who found signs of past glacial activity in places too warm for glaciers in modern times. [5]

    A layer of greenhouse gases – primarily water vapor, and including much smaller amounts of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide – acts as a thermal blanket for the Earth, absorbing heat and warming the surface to a life-supporting average of 59 degrees Fahrenheit (15 degrees Celsius).

    Most climate scientists agree the main cause of the current global warming trend is human expansion of the "greenhouse effect" 1 — warming that results when the atmosphere traps heat radiating from Earth toward space.

  2. author
    blackkoala413 18 Jan 2017 07:48

    Global warming and climate change refer to an increase in average global temperatures. Natural events and human activities are believed to be contributing to an increase in average global temperatures. This is caused primarily by increases in greenhouse gases such as Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ).

    As explained by the US agency, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), there are 7 indicators that would be expected to increase in a warming world (and they are), and 3 indicators would be expected to decrease (and they are):

    Scientific skepticism is healthy. Scientists should always challenge themselves to improve their understanding. Yet this isn''''t what happens with climate change denial. Skeptics vigorously criticise any evidence that supports man-made global warming and yet embrace any argument, op-ed, blog or study that purports to refute global warming. This website gets skeptical about global warming skepticism. Do their arguments have any scientific basis? What does the peer reviewed scientific literature say?

    Stories of the Week. SkS Highlights. El Niño/La Niña Update. Toon of the Week. Quote of the Week. Graphic of the Week. SkS in the News. Photo of the Week. SkS Spotlights. Video of the Week. Coming Soon on SkS. Poster of the Week. Climate Feedback Reviews. SkS Week in Review. 97 Hours of Consensus.

    Meanwhile, national weather agencies had begun to compile masses of reliable observations of temperature, rainfall, and the like. When the figures were analyzed they showed many rises and dips, but no steady long-term change. By the end of the 19th century, scientific opinion had turned decisively against any belief in a human influence on climate. And whatever the regional effects, few imagined that humans could affect the climate of the planet as a whole. [4]

    Prior to the 18th century, scientists had not suspected that prehistoric climates were different from the modern period. By the late 18th century, geologists found evidence of a succession of geological ages with changes in climate. There were various competing theories about these changes, and James Hutton , whose ideas of cyclic change over huge periods of time were later dubbed uniformitarianism , was among those who found signs of past glacial activity in places too warm for glaciers in modern times. [5]

  3. author
    ュ - mingчu 18 Jan 2017 01:45

    Global warming and climate change refer to an increase in average global temperatures. Natural events and human activities are believed to be contributing to an increase in average global temperatures. This is caused primarily by increases in greenhouse gases such as Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ).

    As explained by the US agency, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), there are 7 indicators that would be expected to increase in a warming world (and they are), and 3 indicators would be expected to decrease (and they are):

    Scientific skepticism is healthy. Scientists should always challenge themselves to improve their understanding. Yet this isn't what happens with climate change denial. Skeptics vigorously criticise any evidence that supports man-made global warming and yet embrace any argument, op-ed, blog or study that purports to refute global warming. This website gets skeptical about global warming skepticism. Do their arguments have any scientific basis? What does the peer reviewed scientific literature say?

    Stories of the Week. SkS Highlights. El Niño/La Niña Update. Toon of the Week. Quote of the Week. Graphic of the Week. SkS in the News. Photo of the Week. SkS Spotlights. Video of the Week. Coming Soon on SkS. Poster of the Week. Climate Feedback Reviews. SkS Week in Review. 97 Hours of Consensus.

  4. author
    greenbutterfly928 17 Jan 2017 23:22

    Hi MCL, I may be able to assist you here but first it would help to know at which level you re writing your paper - is it a school report, degree level, doctorate etc. Also, how technical do you want to get?

  5. author
    User1489896017 17 Jan 2017 23:44

    Well climate has always been changing for millions of years without our help! So we and our mere 6 billion people can't do anything to change climate especially only in 200 years or so! Like a drop in the ocean! don't worry man!

  6. author
    User1489021239 18 Jan 2017 09:08

    You will change your mind if you watch C-SPAN2 Book TV tonight at 9:15 PM EST - "The Deniers: The world renowned scientists who stood up against global warming hysteria, political persecution and fraud".

  7. author
    crazysnake283 18 Jan 2017 07:09

    Global warming and climate change refer to an increase in average global temperatures. Natural events and human activities are believed to be contributing to an increase in average global temperatures. This is caused primarily by increases in greenhouse gases such as Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ).

    As explained by the US agency, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), there are 7 indicators that would be expected to increase in a warming world (and they are), and 3 indicators would be expected to decrease (and they are):

    Scientific skepticism is healthy. Scientists should always challenge themselves to improve their understanding. Yet this isn''''''''t what happens with climate change denial. Skeptics vigorously criticise any evidence that supports man-made global warming and yet embrace any argument, op-ed, blog or study that purports to refute global warming. This website gets skeptical about global warming skepticism. Do their arguments have any scientific basis? What does the peer reviewed scientific literature say?

    Stories of the Week. SkS Highlights. El Niño/La Niña Update. Toon of the Week. Quote of the Week. Graphic of the Week. SkS in the News. Photo of the Week. SkS Spotlights. Video of the Week. Coming Soon on SkS. Poster of the Week. Climate Feedback Reviews. SkS Week in Review. 97 Hours of Consensus.

    Meanwhile, national weather agencies had begun to compile masses of reliable observations of temperature, rainfall, and the like. When the figures were analyzed they showed many rises and dips, but no steady long-term change. By the end of the 19th century, scientific opinion had turned decisively against any belief in a human influence on climate. And whatever the regional effects, few imagined that humans could affect the climate of the planet as a whole. [4]

    Prior to the 18th century, scientists had not suspected that prehistoric climates were different from the modern period. By the late 18th century, geologists found evidence of a succession of geological ages with changes in climate. There were various competing theories about these changes, and James Hutton , whose ideas of cyclic change over huge periods of time were later dubbed uniformitarianism , was among those who found signs of past glacial activity in places too warm for glaciers in modern times. [5]

    A layer of greenhouse gases – primarily water vapor, and including much smaller amounts of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide – acts as a thermal blanket for the Earth, absorbing heat and warming the surface to a life-supporting average of 59 degrees Fahrenheit (15 degrees Celsius).

    Most climate scientists agree the main cause of the current global warming trend is human expansion of the "greenhouse effect" 1 — warming that results when the atmosphere traps heat radiating from Earth toward space.

  8. author
    lazydog317 18 Jan 2017 08:17

    Global warming and climate change refer to an increase in average global temperatures. Natural events and human activities are believed to be contributing to an increase in average global temperatures. This is caused primarily by increases in greenhouse gases such as Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ).

    As explained by the US agency, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), there are 7 indicators that would be expected to increase in a warming world (and they are), and 3 indicators would be expected to decrease (and they are):

    Scientific skepticism is healthy. Scientists should always challenge themselves to improve their understanding. Yet this isn''t what happens with climate change denial. Skeptics vigorously criticise any evidence that supports man-made global warming and yet embrace any argument, op-ed, blog or study that purports to refute global warming. This website gets skeptical about global warming skepticism. Do their arguments have any scientific basis? What does the peer reviewed scientific literature say?

    Stories of the Week. SkS Highlights. El Niño/La Niña Update. Toon of the Week. Quote of the Week. Graphic of the Week. SkS in the News. Photo of the Week. SkS Spotlights. Video of the Week. Coming Soon on SkS. Poster of the Week. Climate Feedback Reviews. SkS Week in Review. 97 Hours of Consensus.

    Meanwhile, national weather agencies had begun to compile masses of reliable observations of temperature, rainfall, and the like. When the figures were analyzed they showed many rises and dips, but no steady long-term change. By the end of the 19th century, scientific opinion had turned decisively against any belief in a human influence on climate. And whatever the regional effects, few imagined that humans could affect the climate of the planet as a whole. [4]

    Prior to the 18th century, scientists had not suspected that prehistoric climates were different from the modern period. By the late 18th century, geologists found evidence of a succession of geological ages with changes in climate. There were various competing theories about these changes, and James Hutton , whose ideas of cyclic change over huge periods of time were later dubbed uniformitarianism , was among those who found signs of past glacial activity in places too warm for glaciers in modern times. [5]

  9. author
    User1489405018 18 Jan 2017 07:56

    Home Opinions Science Is global climate change man-made? Add a New Topic. Is global climate change man-made?. Yes, global climate change is definitely man-made.

  10. author
    велди 17 Jan 2017 22:03

    Global warming and climate change refer to an increase in average global temperatures. Natural events and human activities are believed to be contributing to an increase in average global temperatures. This is caused primarily by increases in greenhouse gases such as Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ).

    As explained by the US agency, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), there are 7 indicators that would be expected to increase in a warming world (and they are), and 3 indicators would be expected to decrease (and they are):

    Scientific skepticism is healthy. Scientists should always challenge themselves to improve their understanding. Yet this isn''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''t what happens with climate change denial. Skeptics vigorously criticise any evidence that supports man-made global warming and yet embrace any argument, op-ed, blog or study that purports to refute global warming. This website gets skeptical about global warming skepticism. Do their arguments have any scientific basis? What does the peer reviewed scientific literature say?

    Stories of the Week. SkS Highlights. El Niño/La Niña Update. Toon of the Week. Quote of the Week. Graphic of the Week. SkS in the News. Photo of the Week. SkS Spotlights. Video of the Week. Coming Soon on SkS. Poster of the Week. Climate Feedback Reviews. SkS Week in Review. 97 Hours of Consensus.

    Meanwhile, national weather agencies had begun to compile masses of reliable observations of temperature, rainfall, and the like. When the figures were analyzed they showed many rises and dips, but no steady long-term change. By the end of the 19th century, scientific opinion had turned decisively against any belief in a human influence on climate. And whatever the regional effects, few imagined that humans could affect the climate of the planet as a whole. [4]

    Prior to the 18th century, scientists had not suspected that prehistoric climates were different from the modern period. By the late 18th century, geologists found evidence of a succession of geological ages with changes in climate. There were various competing theories about these changes, and James Hutton , whose ideas of cyclic change over huge periods of time were later dubbed uniformitarianism , was among those who found signs of past glacial activity in places too warm for glaciers in modern times. [5]

    A layer of greenhouse gases – primarily water vapor, and including much smaller amounts of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide – acts as a thermal blanket for the Earth, absorbing heat and warming the surface to a life-supporting average of 59 degrees Fahrenheit (15 degrees Celsius).

    Most climate scientists agree the main cause of the current global warming trend is human expansion of the "greenhouse effect" 1 — warming that results when the atmosphere traps heat radiating from Earth toward space.

    1) There is “no real scientific proof” that the current warming is caused by the rise of greenhouse gases from man’s activity.

    2) Man-made carbon dioxide emissions throughout human history constitute less than 0.00022 percent of the total naturally emitted from the mantle of the earth during geological history.