Persuasive Speech!!!?

18 Jan 2017 21:24 | Author: User1489526458 | Category: Essay topics on moral justice

FAČR Okresní fotbalový svaz Hodonín Tyršova č. 8 ( II.patro) 695 01 Hodonín IČO: 22 88 31 18 Číslo účtu: 246083272/0300 (variabilní symbol č. oddílu)

  1. author
    User1488242121 18 Jan 2017 05:01

    Order essay here good topic for a persuasive essayez

    FAČR Okresní fotbalový svaz Hodonín Tyršova č. 8 ( II.patro) 695 01 Hodonín IČO: 22 88 31 18 Číslo účtu: 246083272/0300 (variabilní symbol č. oddílu)

  2. author
    organicpanda929 17 Jan 2017 22:36

    making people give more to charity i know this seems boring bt ull have lots of good reason to back it up with!

  3. author
    organicswan759 17 Jan 2017 23:20

    Getting people to quit smoking. What happens if you don t have a good diet. the long-term affects. Ghosts.

  4. author
    greenladybug991 18 Jan 2017 03:39

    If you decide to write about capital punishment the best place to start is at http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/student-resource-center Click on ideas for research papers and debates. In the meantime, my take on the death penalty: For the worst crimes, life without parole is better, for many reasons. I’m against the death penalty not because of sympathy for criminals but because it doesn’t reduce crime, prolongs the anguish of families of murder victims, costs a whole lot more than life in prison, and, worst of all, risks executions of innocent people. The worst thing about it. Errors: The system can make tragic mistakes. Cameron Todd Willingham was executed for setting the fire that killed his children, based on what even the Texas Forensics Science Commission acknowledges was junk science. Modern forensics has shown the fire was accidental, not arson. We’ll never know for sure how many people have been executed for crimes they didn’t commit. As of now, 140 wrongly convicted people on death row have been exonerated. DNA is rarely available in homicides, often irrelevant (as in Willingham’s case) and can’t guarantee we won’t execute innocent people. Capital juries are dominated by people who favor the death penalty and are more likely to vote to convict. Keeping killers off the streets for good: Life without parole, on the books in most states, also prevents reoffending. It means what it says, and spending the rest of your life locked up, knowing you’ll never be free, is no picnic. Two big advantages: -an innocent person serving life can be released from prison -life without parole costs less than the death penalty Costs, a surprise to many people: Study after study has found that the death penalty is much more expensive than life in prison. Since the stakes are so high, the process is far more complex than for any other kind of criminal case. The largest costs come at the pre-trial and trial stages. These apply whether or not the defendant is convicted, let alone sentenced to death. Crime reduction (deterrence): The death penalty doesn t keep us safer. Homicide rates for states that use the death penalty are consistently higher than for those that don’t. The most recent FBI data confirms this. For people without a conscience, fear of being caught is the best deterrent. Who gets it: The death penalty isn t reserved for the worst crimes, but for defendants with the worst lawyers. It doesn t apply to people with money. Practically everyone sentenced to death had to rely on an overworked public defender. How many people with money have been executed?? Victims: People assume that families of murder victims want the death penalty imposed. It isn t necessarily so. Some are against it on moral grounds. But even families who have supported it in principle have testified to the protracted and unavoidable damage that the death penalty process does to families like theirs and that life without parole is an appropriate alternative. It comes down to whether we should keep the death penalty for retribution or revenge in spite of its flaws and in spite of the huge toll it exacts on society.