14

Free heredity Essays and Papers - 123helpme

18 Jan 2017 21:24 | Author: User1489066168 | Category: Church turing thesis artificial intelligence

The standard of proof, in essence, can be loosely defined as the quantum of evidence that must be presented before a Court before a fact can be said to exist or not exist. As the type of cases before a Court can be classified into criminal or civil, so can the standard of proof. There is a clear understanding that the Courts follow according to wich the standard of proof to be followed in a criminal case is that of ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ whereas the standard of proof changes, even lowers to the ‘balance of probabilities’ in cases of civil proceedings. It is also widely understood that the standard is higher in criminal cases. This does not mean that the actual quantity of evidence adduced should be more but speaks more of the nature of evidence. Even though such a bifurcation exists, a problem might crop up in the form of criminal charges within a civil case. This is one of the most important questions that the researcher has tried to analyse in this paper. The researcher has analysed the meaning and scope of the two standards, the position in India and finally, the question of a third standard.

In common law, two separate standards of proof are recognized- proof beyond reasonable doubt and proof based on the balance of probabilities. The former is he standard adopted while dealing with criminal cases while the latter is the standard in use in case of civil suits. [ 1 ] Different standards of proof are constructed seemingly to, among other things, minimize the high social costs that may arise on account of errors. [ 2 ] In actuality, these two terms are rarely used, especially in jurisdictions where juries are involved, as the two terms seem to be rather esoteric in nature and not immediately comprehensible. [ 3 ]

Comments
  1. author
    Sabina 18 Jan 2017 07:44

    Hundreds of researchers pick through clinical trial from a major blood-pressure study, to the dismay of some who collected the information.

    In rats, CA1 place cells that encode the location of an aversive experience are reactivated during retrieval of the memory of that event.

    Hello, you are using a very old browser that''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s not supported.
    Please, consider updating your browser to a newer version.

    This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

    It should also be kept in mind that it is not up to the Court to demand that a certain method of proving a fact should be exclusively used with respect to a case before it unless a specific Act requires this to be done. Similarly, the Court cannot ask for a different standard of proof than what is actually sufficient in a particular case. If asked for, it would be deemed a procedural error or an error in law. [ 41 ]

    As an empirical matter, many natural law moral theorists are also natural law legal theorists, but the two theories, strictly speaking, are logically independent. One can deny natural law theory of law but hold a natural law theory of morality. John Austin, the most influential of the early legal positivists, for example, denied the Overlap Thesis but held something that resembles a natural law ethical theory.

    The principal objective of conceptual (or analytic) jurisprudence has traditionally been to provide an account of what distinguishes law as a system of norms from other systems of norms, such as ethical norms. As John Austin describes the project, conceptual jurisprudence seeks "the essence or nature which is common to all laws that are properly so called" (Austin 1995, 11). Accordingly, the task of conceptual jurisprudence is to provide a set of necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of law that distinguishes law from non-law in every possible world.

  2. author
    redswan435 18 Jan 2017 06:22

    Hundreds of researchers pick through clinical trial from a major blood-pressure study, to the dismay of some who collected the information.

    In rats, CA1 place cells that encode the location of an aversive experience are reactivated during retrieval of the memory of that event.

    Hello, you are using a very old browser that''''''''s not supported.
    Please, consider updating your browser to a newer version.

    This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

    It should also be kept in mind that it is not up to the Court to demand that a certain method of proving a fact should be exclusively used with respect to a case before it unless a specific Act requires this to be done. Similarly, the Court cannot ask for a different standard of proof than what is actually sufficient in a particular case. If asked for, it would be deemed a procedural error or an error in law. [ 41 ]

    As an empirical matter, many natural law moral theorists are also natural law legal theorists, but the two theories, strictly speaking, are logically independent. One can deny natural law theory of law but hold a natural law theory of morality. John Austin, the most influential of the early legal positivists, for example, denied the Overlap Thesis but held something that resembles a natural law ethical theory.

    The principal objective of conceptual (or analytic) jurisprudence has traditionally been to provide an account of what distinguishes law as a system of norms from other systems of norms, such as ethical norms. As John Austin describes the project, conceptual jurisprudence seeks "the essence or nature which is common to all laws that are properly so called" (Austin 1995, 11). Accordingly, the task of conceptual jurisprudence is to provide a set of necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of law that distinguishes law from non-law in every possible world.

  3. author
    bluebird207 17 Jan 2017 23:13

    Hundreds of researchers pick through clinical trial from a major blood-pressure study, to the dismay of some who collected the information.

    In rats, CA1 place cells that encode the location of an aversive experience are reactivated during retrieval of the memory of that event.

    Hello, you are using a very old browser that''''s not supported.
    Please, consider updating your browser to a newer version.

    This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

    It should also be kept in mind that it is not up to the Court to demand that a certain method of proving a fact should be exclusively used with respect to a case before it unless a specific Act requires this to be done. Similarly, the Court cannot ask for a different standard of proof than what is actually sufficient in a particular case. If asked for, it would be deemed a procedural error or an error in law. [ 41 ]

  4. author
    silverfish254 18 Jan 2017 02:45

    Hundreds of researchers pick through clinical trial from a major blood-pressure study, to the dismay of some who collected the information.

    In rats, CA1 place cells that encode the location of an aversive experience are reactivated during retrieval of the memory of that event.

    Hello, you are using a very old browser that''''''''''''''''s not supported.
    Please, consider updating your browser to a newer version.

    This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

    It should also be kept in mind that it is not up to the Court to demand that a certain method of proving a fact should be exclusively used with respect to a case before it unless a specific Act requires this to be done. Similarly, the Court cannot ask for a different standard of proof than what is actually sufficient in a particular case. If asked for, it would be deemed a procedural error or an error in law. [ 41 ]

    As an empirical matter, many natural law moral theorists are also natural law legal theorists, but the two theories, strictly speaking, are logically independent. One can deny natural law theory of law but hold a natural law theory of morality. John Austin, the most influential of the early legal positivists, for example, denied the Overlap Thesis but held something that resembles a natural law ethical theory.

    The principal objective of conceptual (or analytic) jurisprudence has traditionally been to provide an account of what distinguishes law as a system of norms from other systems of norms, such as ethical norms. As John Austin describes the project, conceptual jurisprudence seeks "the essence or nature which is common to all laws that are properly so called" (Austin 1995, 11). Accordingly, the task of conceptual jurisprudence is to provide a set of necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of law that distinguishes law from non-law in every possible world.

  5. author
    crazyleopard300 17 Jan 2017 22:55

    Variation won t be too rampant, as by natural selection only the strongest are going to survive. Therefore, most survivors will be pretty similar.

  6. author
    Сосок Хосока с соком 18 Jan 2017 01:56

    Hundreds of researchers pick through clinical trial from a major blood-pressure study, to the dismay of some who collected the information.

    In rats, CA1 place cells that encode the location of an aversive experience are reactivated during retrieval of the memory of that event.

    Hello, you are using a very old browser that''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''s not supported.
    Please, consider updating your browser to a newer version.

    This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

    It should also be kept in mind that it is not up to the Court to demand that a certain method of proving a fact should be exclusively used with respect to a case before it unless a specific Act requires this to be done. Similarly, the Court cannot ask for a different standard of proof than what is actually sufficient in a particular case. If asked for, it would be deemed a procedural error or an error in law. [ 41 ]

    As an empirical matter, many natural law moral theorists are also natural law legal theorists, but the two theories, strictly speaking, are logically independent. One can deny natural law theory of law but hold a natural law theory of morality. John Austin, the most influential of the early legal positivists, for example, denied the Overlap Thesis but held something that resembles a natural law ethical theory.

    The principal objective of conceptual (or analytic) jurisprudence has traditionally been to provide an account of what distinguishes law as a system of norms from other systems of norms, such as ethical norms. As John Austin describes the project, conceptual jurisprudence seeks "the essence or nature which is common to all laws that are properly so called" (Austin 1995, 11). Accordingly, the task of conceptual jurisprudence is to provide a set of necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of law that distinguishes law from non-law in every possible world.

    It may clarify the philosophical stakes in legal positivism by comparing it to a number of other theses with which it is sometimes wrongly identified, and not only by its opponents. (See also Hart, 1958, Fuesser, and Schauer.)

    These three theses establish connections between law and morality that are both necessary and highly significant. Each of them is consistent with the positivist thesis that the existence and content of law depends on social facts, not on its merits. Each of them contributes to an understanding of the nature of law. The familiar idea that legal positivism insists on the separability of law and morality is therefore significantly mistaken.

  7. author
    триксЕ 17 Jan 2017 22:55

    Hundreds of researchers pick through clinical trial from a major blood-pressure study, to the dismay of some who collected the information.

    In rats, CA1 place cells that encode the location of an aversive experience are reactivated during retrieval of the memory of that event.

  8. author
    redlion420 18 Jan 2017 00:08

    Order paper here essays on the law of nature.com

    The standard of proof, in essence, can be loosely defined as the quantum of evidence that must be presented before a Court before a fact can be said to exist or not exist. As the type of cases before a Court can be classified into criminal or civil, so can the standard of proof. There is a clear understanding that the Courts follow according to wich the standard of proof to be followed in a criminal case is that of ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ whereas the standard of proof changes, even lowers to the ‘balance of probabilities’ in cases of civil proceedings. It is also widely understood that the standard is higher in criminal cases. This does not mean that the actual quantity of evidence adduced should be more but speaks more of the nature of evidence. Even though such a bifurcation exists, a problem might crop up in the form of criminal charges within a civil case. This is one of the most important questions that the researcher has tried to analyse in this paper. The researcher has analysed the meaning and scope of the two standards, the position in India and finally, the question of a third standard.

    In common law, two separate standards of proof are recognized- proof beyond reasonable doubt and proof based on the balance of probabilities. The former is he standard adopted while dealing with criminal cases while the latter is the standard in use in case of civil suits. [ 1 ] Different standards of proof are constructed seemingly to, among other things, minimize the high social costs that may arise on account of errors. [ 2 ] In actuality, these two terms are rarely used, especially in jurisdictions where juries are involved, as the two terms seem to be rather esoteric in nature and not immediately comprehensible. [ 3 ]

  9. author
    redelephant682 17 Jan 2017 23:54

    The complete text of Essays of Francis Bacon. The Essays or Counsels, Civil and Moral, of Francis Ld. Verulam Viscount St. Albans

  10. author
    ♪ 🕊щ(ಥ益ಥщ) 🕊 ♪ 18 Jan 2017 07:02

    Hundreds of researchers pick through clinical trial from a major blood-pressure study, to the dismay of some who collected the information.

    In rats, CA1 place cells that encode the location of an aversive experience are reactivated during retrieval of the memory of that event.

    Hello, you are using a very old browser that's not supported.
    Please, consider updating your browser to a newer version.

  11. author
    bluefrog693 18 Jan 2017 07:59

    Clearly you have something against facts, reality and truth. You must be one of those desperate, pathetic fools who are trying to re-write reality to keep their delusions about bronze age myths alive. Good luck with that.

  12. author
    tinyduck637 18 Jan 2017 03:04

    Hundreds of researchers pick through clinical trial from a major blood-pressure study, to the dismay of some who collected the information.

    In rats, CA1 place cells that encode the location of an aversive experience are reactivated during retrieval of the memory of that event.

    Hello, you are using a very old browser that''s not supported.
    Please, consider updating your browser to a newer version.

    This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

    It should also be kept in mind that it is not up to the Court to demand that a certain method of proving a fact should be exclusively used with respect to a case before it unless a specific Act requires this to be done. Similarly, the Court cannot ask for a different standard of proof than what is actually sufficient in a particular case. If asked for, it would be deemed a procedural error or an error in law. [ 41 ]

  13. author
    organicbear583 18 Jan 2017 00:39

    If it wasn t for global warming, Chicago would still be under a mile of ice. Cro Magnon people learned how to make fire and the smoke from their campsites melted the glaciers.